Friday, September 01, 2006

At Least the Son-in-law's a Winner

Granger Machinery holds regional exclusive parts franchises for two farm machinery manufacturers. They stock after-market truck engine and tractor parts for other manufacturers on a non-exclusive basis. With the purchase of a related wholesale business in southern Indiana, the company has sixty employees.

Until four years ago, Frank Granger couldn’t foresee the company’s future, or his own and his son’s financial security.

Eddie, 39, has worked at Granger Machinery for nine years, primarily taking telephone orders. He spent his twenties as an itinerant sailboat crewman and competitive windsurfer. He’s a likeable young man with learning disabilities that make him shun any kind of training that involves books and numbers. Even simple order taking suffers from his errors. As Frank grew increasingly critical, Eddie became increasingly defensive.

Eddie views his father’s unwillingness to hand over the company to him as a “letting go” problem. On the contrary, Frank is more than ready to turn the company over—to his competent son-in-law—only hesitating out of concern for Eddie’s feelings and livelihood.

Eddie’s older sister and her husband, Mark, moved from Chicago down to Danville four years ago, so that Mark could come on board as General Manager. Well qualified, Mark has done a great job.

Eddie talks as if he and Mark will run the company more or less as equals once his father retires. “If he wants to be President, I’ll be General Manager, I don’t care. Or we could take turns, him five years and then me for the next five or whatever. I heard about a family business where they do like that.” It seems an astonishingly naïve outlook—no reference to skills, work history, or leadership. Eddie’s unrealistic vision of the future is about to be dashed by Mark’s and Frank’s plans.

Mark and Diane approached Frank diplomatically about purchasing a majority of the stock. Frank promised to get advice about how to transfer control to Mark within an estate plan that includes Eddie and another, oldest daughter not involved in the business.

Diane says her brother “really wants to stay in the family business, answering the phone ‘Granger Machinery, Ed Granger here.’ ” She and Mark both feel it will be possible to keep Ed as an employee, compensated appropriately for his sales performance, after Dad leaves.

The senior Grangers pick me up at my motel and we drive over the Indiana border to the Beef House restaurant for dinner. They’ve mentioned that it’s just off I-74, so I’m surprised when instead of driving south toward that east-west highway, Frank heads his white Lincoln north to the edge of town and then off onto a little farm road. We drive between eight-foot-high corn and low soybean plants, the latter dark green, sharply illuminated by the setting sun behind us. Ahead, incandescent pink clouds spread across the horizon. We pass a tractor towing some sort of menacing implement. Frank and the farmer wave at one another.

Peg Granger is a retired English teacher. Well informed about business and legal matters, she participates in all financial and estate planning meetings. She and Frank own 100% of the business. They reckon it’s worth about $2.5M today, which constitutes 80% of their net worth. At 67, he wants to retire within two years, if possible.

How can the Grangers treat their three children equally in their estate plan, while ensuring that Mark and Diane get at least a controlling share of the business and that Eddie can stay in the company without hampering Mark?

copyright reserved 2006, Kaye Family Business Associates, Inc.

7 Comments:

Anonymous said...

They made the right decisions already to sell the co to Mark (100%, say 10% a year over 10 yrs. Then they can leave their estate equally to their 3 children.

September 02, 2006  
Ken Kaye said...

Not so fast! They're only 67. If Mark fires Eddie or Eddie quits, will his parents have to support him?

September 08, 2006  
Mark (no relation) said...

Make Mark and Diane promise that Eddie can have a job as long as he wants to work there.

September 11, 2006  
Anonymous said...

I can see problems with that--youre saying no matter how poorly you perform or how disruptive we won't fire you? Better off paying him to stay away, which happens.

September 13, 2006  
C. Zaharias said...

The parents decision whether to support Eddie should be entirely separate from the biz succession. We don't have enough facts about why he might need their support.

September 13, 2006  
Ken Kaye said...

If Mr. and Mrs. Granger are hyperconcerned about equality, they can make annual gifts to all three children. The problem is, though, there's not much money here for them to give away. They may need all of it before they die.

September 14, 2006  
Larry Hollar said...

1. Are we really hampered by having to make the estate "equal"? Why not inform everyone about how fair might not be equal. Then start the planning.
2. "No matter how poorly..." welcome to the family! It is a good point, but how many can institute tough love when the person has a disability?
3. This is a great lesson for anyone under the age of 40: start planning your retirement NOW.

December 22, 2006  

Post a Comment

<< Home